<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Email Spoofing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2004/11/email_spoofing.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2004/11/email_spoofing.html</link>
	<description>Web Marketing Strategies for Small Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:51:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Flight</title>
		<link>http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2004/11/email_spoofing.html/comment-page-1#comment-1655</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Flight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2005 04:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2004/11/email_spoofing.html#comment-1655</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Lee,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I can see where a host would not enjoy someone constantly updating their disable list (black list). For myself I do my own hosting so I only have myself to bother! :)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;-Tim&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lee,</p>
<p>I can see where a host would not enjoy someone constantly updating their disable list (black list). For myself I do my own hosting so I only have myself to bother! <img src='http://www.flyteblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>-Tim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Flight</title>
		<link>http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2004/11/email_spoofing.html/comment-page-1#comment-9471</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Flight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2005 04:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2004/11/email_spoofing.html#comment-9471</guid>
		<description>Hi Lee,

I can see where a host would not enjoy someone constantly updating their disable list (black list). For myself I do my own hosting so I only have myself to bother! :)

-Tim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lee,</p>
<p>I can see where a host would not enjoy someone constantly updating their disable list (black list). For myself I do my own hosting so I only have myself to bother! <img src='http://www.flyteblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>-Tim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Harris</title>
		<link>http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2004/11/email_spoofing.html/comment-page-1#comment-1654</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2004/11/email_spoofing.html#comment-1654</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi, I am quite interested in this article as I too have exclusive access to my domain and had the bright idea of these throwaway addresses, however, on speaking to my host now that I need to disable one of them, they are suggesting I should just set up POP3 accounts for all the ones I want to use rather than having the ability to set up a &quot;disable&quot; list for ones I don&#039;t want to use  :-(&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I am quite interested in this article as I too have exclusive access to my domain and had the bright idea of these throwaway addresses, however, on speaking to my host now that I need to disable one of them, they are suggesting I should just set up POP3 accounts for all the ones I want to use rather than having the ability to set up a &quot;disable&quot; list for ones I don&#39;t want to use  <img src='http://www.flyteblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Harris</title>
		<link>http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2004/11/email_spoofing.html/comment-page-1#comment-9470</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2004/11/email_spoofing.html#comment-9470</guid>
		<description>Hi, I am quite interested in this article as I too have exclusive access to my domain and had the bright idea of these throwaway addresses, however, on speaking to my host now that I need to disable one of them, they are suggesting I should just set up POP3 accounts for all the ones I want to use rather than having the ability to set up a &quot;disable&quot; list for ones I don&#039;t want to use  :-(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I am quite interested in this article as I too have exclusive access to my domain and had the bright idea of these throwaway addresses, however, on speaking to my host now that I need to disable one of them, they are suggesting I should just set up POP3 accounts for all the ones I want to use rather than having the ability to set up a &quot;disable&quot; list for ones I don&#039;t want to use  <img src='http://www.flyteblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Flight</title>
		<link>http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2004/11/email_spoofing.html/comment-page-1#comment-1653</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Flight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2004 00:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2004/11/email_spoofing.html#comment-1653</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve been criticized for this many times, however I am a fan of catch-all email addresses in certain instances. It can be a fantastic way to control sp@m if you have your own domain name and you are the only person receiving email at that domain .&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;By enabling a catch-all account I can create &quot;throw-away&quot; email addresses on the fly, much like how credit card companies can now issue you a temporary credit card number good for a few hours.  Whenever I register on a website I can create an email address for use only on that site. So if I register for an account at amazon.com I would tell them my email address is amazon@mydomain.com. The catch-all system delivers that email directly to me with no setup.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;These &quot;throw-away&quot; addresses also make it easy to filter my incoming mail into the appropriate boxes in my email client. I can simply filter by who the email was sent &quot;to&quot; and have a rule that works 100% of the time.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;However the best use of the catch-all is the fact that I can discard any address as necessary. If a website decides to sell my email address to a sp@mmer I will instantly know which company sold me out by the address the email is sent to. Likewise if an address gets harvested I can discard the address as well.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Furthermore I can then tell my Xserve (server) to refuse messages sent to the address the sp@mmers now have. I also refuse messages to common usernames such as sales@, webmaster@, info@, etc. About two years ago I would get about 200 sp@ms per day; due to these techniques I am now down to about 2 per month. That&#039;s not a typo.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As Rich suggests, this can open the floodgates when someone spoofs your address and you start to get hit with returned emails. This has happened to me once but only resulted in about 30 bounce-back messages. Not everyone will have that level of flexibility with their server/host and few people have a domain name that is unique to one person. However if you can attain that setup it can be a great tool.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve been criticized for this many times, however I am a fan of catch-all email addresses in certain instances. It can be a fantastic way to control sp@m if you have your own domain name and you are the only person receiving email at that domain .</p>
<p>By enabling a catch-all account I can create &quot;throw-away&quot; email addresses on the fly, much like how credit card companies can now issue you a temporary credit card number good for a few hours.  Whenever I register on a website I can create an email address for use only on that site. So if I register for an account at amazon.com I would tell them my email address is <a href="mailto:amazon@mydomain.com">amazon@mydomain.com</a>. The catch-all system delivers that email directly to me with no setup.</p>
<p>These &quot;throw-away&quot; addresses also make it easy to filter my incoming mail into the appropriate boxes in my email client. I can simply filter by who the email was sent &quot;to&quot; and have a rule that works 100% of the time.</p>
<p>However the best use of the catch-all is the fact that I can discard any address as necessary. If a website decides to sell my email address to a sp@mmer I will instantly know which company sold me out by the address the email is sent to. Likewise if an address gets harvested I can discard the address as well.</p>
<p>Furthermore I can then tell my Xserve (server) to refuse messages sent to the address the sp@mmers now have. I also refuse messages to common usernames such as sales@, webmaster@, info@, etc. About two years ago I would get about 200 sp@ms per day; due to these techniques I am now down to about 2 per month. That&#39;s not a typo.</p>
<p>As Rich suggests, this can open the floodgates when someone spoofs your address and you start to get hit with returned emails. This has happened to me once but only resulted in about 30 bounce-back messages. Not everyone will have that level of flexibility with their server/host and few people have a domain name that is unique to one person. However if you can attain that setup it can be a great tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Flight</title>
		<link>http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2004/11/email_spoofing.html/comment-page-1#comment-9469</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Flight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2004 00:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2004/11/email_spoofing.html#comment-9469</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been criticized for this many times, however I am a fan of catch-all email addresses in certain instances. It can be a fantastic way to control sp@m if you have your own domain name and you are the only person receiving email at that domain .

By enabling a catch-all account I can create &quot;throw-away&quot; email addresses on the fly, much like how credit card companies can now issue you a temporary credit card number good for a few hours.  Whenever I register on a website I can create an email address for use only on that site. So if I register for an account at amazon.com I would tell them my email address is amazon@mydomain.com. The catch-all system delivers that email directly to me with no setup.

These &quot;throw-away&quot; addresses also make it easy to filter my incoming mail into the appropriate boxes in my email client. I can simply filter by who the email was sent &quot;to&quot; and have a rule that works 100% of the time.

However the best use of the catch-all is the fact that I can discard any address as necessary. If a website decides to sell my email address to a sp@mmer I will instantly know which company sold me out by the address the email is sent to. Likewise if an address gets harvested I can discard the address as well.

Furthermore I can then tell my Xserve (server) to refuse messages sent to the address the sp@mmers now have. I also refuse messages to common usernames such as sales@, webmaster@, info@, etc. About two years ago I would get about 200 sp@ms per day; due to these techniques I am now down to about 2 per month. That&#039;s not a typo.

As Rich suggests, this can open the floodgates when someone spoofs your address and you start to get hit with returned emails. This has happened to me once but only resulted in about 30 bounce-back messages. Not everyone will have that level of flexibility with their server/host and few people have a domain name that is unique to one person. However if you can attain that setup it can be a great tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve been criticized for this many times, however I am a fan of catch-all email addresses in certain instances. It can be a fantastic way to control sp@m if you have your own domain name and you are the only person receiving email at that domain .</p>
<p>By enabling a catch-all account I can create &quot;throw-away&quot; email addresses on the fly, much like how credit card companies can now issue you a temporary credit card number good for a few hours.  Whenever I register on a website I can create an email address for use only on that site. So if I register for an account at amazon.com I would tell them my email address is <a href="mailto:amazon@mydomain.com">amazon@mydomain.com</a>. The catch-all system delivers that email directly to me with no setup.</p>
<p>These &quot;throw-away&quot; addresses also make it easy to filter my incoming mail into the appropriate boxes in my email client. I can simply filter by who the email was sent &quot;to&quot; and have a rule that works 100% of the time.</p>
<p>However the best use of the catch-all is the fact that I can discard any address as necessary. If a website decides to sell my email address to a sp@mmer I will instantly know which company sold me out by the address the email is sent to. Likewise if an address gets harvested I can discard the address as well.</p>
<p>Furthermore I can then tell my Xserve (server) to refuse messages sent to the address the sp@mmers now have. I also refuse messages to common usernames such as sales@, webmaster@, info@, etc. About two years ago I would get about 200 sp@ms per day; due to these techniques I am now down to about 2 per month. That&#039;s not a typo.</p>
<p>As Rich suggests, this can open the floodgates when someone spoofs your address and you start to get hit with returned emails. This has happened to me once but only resulted in about 30 bounce-back messages. Not everyone will have that level of flexibility with their server/host and few people have a domain name that is unique to one person. However if you can attain that setup it can be a great tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

