Comments on: SEO Philosophy: Naturalists vs. Eugenists http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2005/08/seo_philosophy_.html Web Marketing Strategies for Small Business Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:51:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: remove antivirus 8 http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2005/08/seo_philosophy_.html/comment-page-1#comment-9871 remove antivirus 8 Thu, 20 Jan 2011 03:33:00 +0000 http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2005/08/seo_philosophy_.html#comment-9871 Insightful, thanks for sharing. Insightful, thanks for sharing.

]]> By: Alla http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2005/08/seo_philosophy_.html/comment-page-1#comment-9714 Alla Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:17:00 +0000 http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2005/08/seo_philosophy_.html#comment-9714 Normally I wouldn’t comment on posts but I felt that I had to as your writing style is actually good. You have broken down a tough area so that it easy to understand. _________________________ <a>SEO Armenia </a> Normally I wouldn’t comment on posts but I felt that I had to as your writing style is actually good. You have broken down a tough area so that it easy to understand.

_________________________
SEO Armenia

]]> By: Bill http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2005/08/seo_philosophy_.html/comment-page-1#comment-3150 Bill Tue, 12 Jan 2010 02:47:03 +0000 http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2005/08/seo_philosophy_.html#comment-3150 Content based Optimisation (Naturalist) must provide more accuracy as matching content is the focus of any users search. Personally, the more aggressive approach (Eugenists) may attract visitors to the site unrelated to the content. This must effect click=sales figures as well as produce exaggerated hit counts. I am all too familiar with the frustration caused by not finding anything relevant on a matched site and I am sure I am not alone. Is the focus on providing accurate results for search engine users or on generating money? If we are interested in professionalism, ethics and user respect the approach should be "naturalist", obviously. As the recent Global Financial Crisis showed we are more interested in trying to avoid paying our own bills and leeching the last dollar from our fellow man/woman than actually assisting our fellow man or woman. The fact that there is a debate between real content matching or trickery is appalling. Ta Bill, Content based Optimisation (Naturalist) must provide more accuracy as matching content is the focus of any users search.
Personally, the more aggressive approach (Eugenists) may attract visitors to the site unrelated to the content. This must effect click=sales figures as well as produce exaggerated hit counts.
I am all too familiar with the frustration caused by not finding anything relevant on a matched site and I am sure I am not alone.
Is the focus on providing accurate results for search engine users or on generating money?
If we are interested in professionalism, ethics and user respect the approach should be “naturalist”, obviously.
As the recent Global Financial Crisis showed we are more interested in trying to avoid paying our own bills and leeching the last dollar from our fellow man/woman than actually assisting our fellow man or woman.

The fact that there is a debate between real content matching or trickery is appalling.
Ta Bill,

]]> By: Bill http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2005/08/seo_philosophy_.html/comment-page-1#comment-9214 Bill Tue, 12 Jan 2010 02:47:00 +0000 http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2005/08/seo_philosophy_.html#comment-9214 Content based Optimisation (Naturalist) must provide more accuracy as matching content is the focus of any users search. Personally, the more aggressive approach (Eugenists) may attract visitors to the site unrelated to the content. This must effect click=sales figures as well as produce exaggerated hit counts. I am all too familiar with the frustration caused by not finding anything relevant on a matched site and I am sure I am not alone. Is the focus on providing accurate results for search engine users or on generating money? If we are interested in professionalism, ethics and user respect the approach should be "naturalist", obviously. As the recent Global Financial Crisis showed we are more interested in trying to avoid paying our own bills and leeching the last dollar from our fellow man/woman than actually assisting our fellow man or woman. The fact that there is a debate between real content matching or trickery is appalling. Ta Bill, Content based Optimisation (Naturalist) must provide more accuracy as matching content is the focus of any users search.
Personally, the more aggressive approach (Eugenists) may attract visitors to the site unrelated to the content. This must effect click=sales figures as well as produce exaggerated hit counts.
I am all too familiar with the frustration caused by not finding anything relevant on a matched site and I am sure I am not alone.
Is the focus on providing accurate results for search engine users or on generating money?
If we are interested in professionalism, ethics and user respect the approach should be “naturalist”, obviously.
As the recent Global Financial Crisis showed we are more interested in trying to avoid paying our own bills and leeching the last dollar from our fellow man/woman than actually assisting our fellow man or woman.

The fact that there is a debate between real content matching or trickery is appalling.
Ta Bill,

]]> By: James http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2005/08/seo_philosophy_.html/comment-page-1#comment-1414 James Sun, 14 Dec 2008 12:09:45 +0000 http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2005/08/seo_philosophy_.html#comment-1414 <p>Thanks for a great article !<br /> I can only agree that it works. Content and good meta tags is the key to success with SEO.</p> Thanks for a great article !
I can only agree that it works. Content and good meta tags is the key to success with SEO.

]]> By: James http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2005/08/seo_philosophy_.html/comment-page-1#comment-1413 James Sun, 14 Dec 2008 12:09:37 +0000 http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2005/08/seo_philosophy_.html#comment-1413 <p>Thanks for a great article !<br /> I can only agree that it works. Content and good meta tags is the key to success with SEO.</p> Thanks for a great article !
I can only agree that it works. Content and good meta tags is the key to success with SEO.

]]> By: James http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2005/08/seo_philosophy_.html/comment-page-1#comment-9212 James Sun, 14 Dec 2008 12:09:00 +0000 http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2005/08/seo_philosophy_.html#comment-9212 Thanks for a great article ! I can only agree that it works. Content and good meta tags is the key to success with SEO. Thanks for a great article !
I can only agree that it works. Content and good meta tags is the key to success with SEO.

]]> By: James http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2005/08/seo_philosophy_.html/comment-page-1#comment-9213 James Sun, 14 Dec 2008 12:09:00 +0000 http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2005/08/seo_philosophy_.html#comment-9213 Thanks for a great article ! I can only agree that it works. Content and good meta tags is the key to success with SEO. Thanks for a great article !
I can only agree that it works. Content and good meta tags is the key to success with SEO.

]]> By: Arthur http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2005/08/seo_philosophy_.html/comment-page-1#comment-1412 Arthur Thu, 20 Sep 2007 20:19:42 +0000 http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2005/08/seo_philosophy_.html#comment-1412 <p>I'm definitely Eugenist </p> I'm definitely Eugenist

]]> By: Arthur http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2005/08/seo_philosophy_.html/comment-page-1#comment-9211 Arthur Thu, 20 Sep 2007 20:19:00 +0000 http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2005/08/seo_philosophy_.html#comment-9211 I'm definitely Eugenist I'm definitely Eugenist

]]>