<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ugly Web Sites: Is Ugly the New Black?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2006/03/ugly_web_sites_.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2006/03/ugly_web_sites_.html</link>
	<description>Web Marketing Strategies for Small Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:51:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2006/03/ugly_web_sites_.html/comment-page-1#comment-1251</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 16:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2006/03/ugly_web_sites_.html#comment-1251</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for bringing this up! I had a draft started about this same topic, but you beat me to it. Just to add to the list of ugly sites that are known to make lots of money.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;www.engadget.com&lt;br /&gt;
www.camcorderinfo.com&lt;br /&gt;
www.livingroom.org.au/photolog/&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think you are correct though, in many cases people probably click on the ads because they don&#039;t realize they are an ad and they become the more attractive part of the site.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I also wonder if the popularity of these sites can partially be attributed to &quot;root for the underdog&quot; attitudes. Possibly why blogs have been so hot lately and things like craigslist where more people want to stop supporting the &quot;big brother&quot; sites.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This prompted me to try to find a list of websites I felt had a stunning design, and also were profitable with advertising... Not much luck so far.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for bringing this up! I had a draft started about this same topic, but you beat me to it. Just to add to the list of ugly sites that are known to make lots of money.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.camcorderinfo.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.camcorderinfo.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.livingroom.org.au/photolog/" rel="nofollow">http://www.livingroom.org.au/photolog/</a></p>
<p>I think you are correct though, in many cases people probably click on the ads because they don&#39;t realize they are an ad and they become the more attractive part of the site.</p>
<p>I also wonder if the popularity of these sites can partially be attributed to &quot;root for the underdog&quot; attitudes. Possibly why blogs have been so hot lately and things like craigslist where more people want to stop supporting the &quot;big brother&quot; sites.</p>
<p>This prompted me to try to find a list of websites I felt had a stunning design, and also were profitable with advertising&#8230; Not much luck so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2006/03/ugly_web_sites_.html/comment-page-1#comment-9079</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2006/03/ugly_web_sites_.html#comment-9079</guid>
		<description>Thanks for bringing this up! I had a draft started about this same topic, but you beat me to it. Just to add to the list of ugly sites that are known to make lots of money.

www.engadget.com
www.camcorderinfo.com
www.livingroom.org.au/photolog/

I think you are correct though, in many cases people probably click on the ads because they don&#039;t realize they are an ad and they become the more attractive part of the site.

I also wonder if the popularity of these sites can partially be attributed to &quot;root for the underdog&quot; attitudes. Possibly why blogs have been so hot lately and things like craigslist where more people want to stop supporting the &quot;big brother&quot; sites.

This prompted me to try to find a list of websites I felt had a stunning design, and also were profitable with advertising... Not much luck so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for bringing this up! I had a draft started about this same topic, but you beat me to it. Just to add to the list of ugly sites that are known to make lots of money.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.camcorderinfo.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.camcorderinfo.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.livingroom.org.au/photolog/" rel="nofollow">http://www.livingroom.org.au/photolog/</a></p>
<p>I think you are correct though, in many cases people probably click on the ads because they don&#039;t realize they are an ad and they become the more attractive part of the site.</p>
<p>I also wonder if the popularity of these sites can partially be attributed to &quot;root for the underdog&quot; attitudes. Possibly why blogs have been so hot lately and things like craigslist where more people want to stop supporting the &quot;big brother&quot; sites.</p>
<p>This prompted me to try to find a list of websites I felt had a stunning design, and also were profitable with advertising&#8230; Not much luck so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

