<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Verizon&#8217;s War on Free Speech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2007/09/verizons-war-on.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2007/09/verizons-war-on.html</link>
	<description>Web Marketing Strategies for Small Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:51:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denise aka The Blog Squad</title>
		<link>http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2007/09/verizons-war-on.html/comment-page-1#comment-618</link>
		<dc:creator>Denise aka The Blog Squad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 21:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2007/09/verizons-war-on.html#comment-618</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I forgot to mention that yesterday, by coincidence, we interviewed Russell Morgan, an expert on mobile message markting, on our show Blogging and Beyond. We discussed this issue and he said it&#039;s probably about the money.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Apparently, one way to send text messages is by email. If that&#039;s what NARAL was doing, then Verizon would not make any money on the organization. Only if they use &quot;short key&quot; technology, then the organization would be paying for the messages and the mobile company gets paid by both the sender AND the receiver.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I forgot to mention that yesterday, by coincidence, we interviewed Russell Morgan, an expert on mobile message markting, on our show Blogging and Beyond. We discussed this issue and he said it&#39;s probably about the money.</p>
<p>Apparently, one way to send text messages is by email. If that&#39;s what NARAL was doing, then Verizon would not make any money on the organization. Only if they use &quot;short key&quot; technology, then the organization would be paying for the messages and the mobile company gets paid by both the sender AND the receiver.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denise aka The Blog Squad</title>
		<link>http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2007/09/verizons-war-on.html/comment-page-1#comment-8490</link>
		<dc:creator>Denise aka The Blog Squad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 21:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2007/09/verizons-war-on.html#comment-8490</guid>
		<description>I forgot to mention that yesterday, by coincidence, we interviewed Russell Morgan, an expert on mobile message markting, on our show Blogging and Beyond. We discussed this issue and he said it&#039;s probably about the money.

Apparently, one way to send text messages is by email. If that&#039;s what NARAL was doing, then Verizon would not make any money on the organization. Only if they use &quot;short key&quot; technology, then the organization would be paying for the messages and the mobile company gets paid by both the sender AND the receiver.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I forgot to mention that yesterday, by coincidence, we interviewed Russell Morgan, an expert on mobile message markting, on our show Blogging and Beyond. We discussed this issue and he said it&#039;s probably about the money.</p>
<p>Apparently, one way to send text messages is by email. If that&#039;s what NARAL was doing, then Verizon would not make any money on the organization. Only if they use &quot;short key&quot; technology, then the organization would be paying for the messages and the mobile company gets paid by both the sender AND the receiver.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Brooks</title>
		<link>http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2007/09/verizons-war-on.html/comment-page-1#comment-617</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Brooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 21:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2007/09/verizons-war-on.html#comment-617</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Denise,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks; heard that they reversed it after the fact. Still, very scary.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Denise,</p>
<p>Thanks; heard that they reversed it after the fact. Still, very scary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Brooks</title>
		<link>http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2007/09/verizons-war-on.html/comment-page-1#comment-8489</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Brooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 21:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2007/09/verizons-war-on.html#comment-8489</guid>
		<description>Denise,

Thanks; heard that they reversed it after the fact. Still, very scary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Denise,</p>
<p>Thanks; heard that they reversed it after the fact. Still, very scary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denise aka The Blog Squad</title>
		<link>http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2007/09/verizons-war-on.html/comment-page-1#comment-616</link>
		<dc:creator>Denise aka The Blog Squad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 20:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2007/09/verizons-war-on.html#comment-616</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;After a ton of public pressure, Verizon reversed their decision yesterday. And yes, just imagine if it were something else, not abortion rights. It&#039;s scary to think a corporation can restrict what we see, read or hear. Especially when the messages being sent have been REQUESTED by the person receiving them.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After a ton of public pressure, Verizon reversed their decision yesterday. And yes, just imagine if it were something else, not abortion rights. It&#39;s scary to think a corporation can restrict what we see, read or hear. Especially when the messages being sent have been REQUESTED by the person receiving them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denise aka The Blog Squad</title>
		<link>http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2007/09/verizons-war-on.html/comment-page-1#comment-8488</link>
		<dc:creator>Denise aka The Blog Squad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 20:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2007/09/verizons-war-on.html#comment-8488</guid>
		<description>After a ton of public pressure, Verizon reversed their decision yesterday. And yes, just imagine if it were something else, not abortion rights. It&#039;s scary to think a corporation can restrict what we see, read or hear. Especially when the messages being sent have been REQUESTED by the person receiving them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After a ton of public pressure, Verizon reversed their decision yesterday. And yes, just imagine if it were something else, not abortion rights. It&#039;s scary to think a corporation can restrict what we see, read or hear. Especially when the messages being sent have been REQUESTED by the person receiving them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

