<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can Links Help Your Search Engine Visibility?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2008/04/can-links-help.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2008/04/can-links-help.html</link>
	<description>Web Marketing Strategies for Small Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:51:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2008/04/can-links-help.html/comment-page-1#comment-454</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 21:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2008/04/can-links-help.html#comment-454</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Rich,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks for bringing up this important and often neglected topic.  One thing I&#039;d respectfully disagree with is that &quot;trading links with another site where they link to you and you link to them&quot; will ALWAYS result in &quot;little to no search engine benefit.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Yes, the traditional Joeswebsite.com/links.htm with 10,000 links to sites all over the place linked to from YOUR /links.htm page with 10,000 links is not doing you, the internet, or your search rankings any favors.  But there are times when links can be &quot;reciprocal&quot; without being a hack.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For example, I link to an article that you write I happen to find really informative, and then later on your link to a different one of mine.  &quot;Reciprocal,&quot; since we do both link to each other, but not as obvious as having two pages both with tons of links linking to each other.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I can&#039;t believe that Google indiscriminately equates all reciprocal links on the same playing field.  I think if biz owners focus on developing high-quality, relevant links to and from their site, they&#039;ll generally be in the right direction.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thoughts?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Fred&lt;br /&gt;
SEO Vision/SEO Audio&lt;br /&gt;
www.hallme.com/blog&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rich,</p>
<p>Thanks for bringing up this important and often neglected topic.  One thing I&#39;d respectfully disagree with is that &quot;trading links with another site where they link to you and you link to them&quot; will ALWAYS result in &quot;little to no search engine benefit.&quot;</p>
<p>Yes, the traditional Joeswebsite.com/links.htm with 10,000 links to sites all over the place linked to from YOUR /links.htm page with 10,000 links is not doing you, the internet, or your search rankings any favors.  But there are times when links can be &quot;reciprocal&quot; without being a hack.</p>
<p>For example, I link to an article that you write I happen to find really informative, and then later on your link to a different one of mine.  &quot;Reciprocal,&quot; since we do both link to each other, but not as obvious as having two pages both with tons of links linking to each other.</p>
<p>I can&#39;t believe that Google indiscriminately equates all reciprocal links on the same playing field.  I think if biz owners focus on developing high-quality, relevant links to and from their site, they&#39;ll generally be in the right direction.</p>
<p>Thoughts?</p>
<p>Fred<br />
SEO Vision/SEO Audio<br />
<a href="http://www.hallme.com/blog" rel="nofollow">http://www.hallme.com/blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2008/04/can-links-help.html/comment-page-1#comment-8284</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 21:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2008/04/can-links-help.html#comment-8284</guid>
		<description>Rich,

Thanks for bringing up this important and often neglected topic.  One thing I&#039;d respectfully disagree with is that &quot;trading links with another site where they link to you and you link to them&quot; will ALWAYS result in &quot;little to no search engine benefit.&quot;

Yes, the traditional Joeswebsite.com/links.htm with 10,000 links to sites all over the place linked to from YOUR /links.htm page with 10,000 links is not doing you, the internet, or your search rankings any favors.  But there are times when links can be &quot;reciprocal&quot; without being a hack.

For example, I link to an article that you write I happen to find really informative, and then later on your link to a different one of mine.  &quot;Reciprocal,&quot; since we do both link to each other, but not as obvious as having two pages both with tons of links linking to each other.

I can&#039;t believe that Google indiscriminately equates all reciprocal links on the same playing field.  I think if biz owners focus on developing high-quality, relevant links to and from their site, they&#039;ll generally be in the right direction.

Thoughts?

Fred
SEO Vision/SEO Audio
www.hallme.com/blog</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rich,</p>
<p>Thanks for bringing up this important and often neglected topic.  One thing I&#039;d respectfully disagree with is that &quot;trading links with another site where they link to you and you link to them&quot; will ALWAYS result in &quot;little to no search engine benefit.&quot;</p>
<p>Yes, the traditional Joeswebsite.com/links.htm with 10,000 links to sites all over the place linked to from YOUR /links.htm page with 10,000 links is not doing you, the internet, or your search rankings any favors.  But there are times when links can be &quot;reciprocal&quot; without being a hack.</p>
<p>For example, I link to an article that you write I happen to find really informative, and then later on your link to a different one of mine.  &quot;Reciprocal,&quot; since we do both link to each other, but not as obvious as having two pages both with tons of links linking to each other.</p>
<p>I can&#039;t believe that Google indiscriminately equates all reciprocal links on the same playing field.  I think if biz owners focus on developing high-quality, relevant links to and from their site, they&#039;ll generally be in the right direction.</p>
<p>Thoughts?</p>
<p>Fred<br />
SEO Vision/SEO Audio<br />
<a href="http://www.hallme.com/blog" rel="nofollow">http://www.hallme.com/blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

