<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Trouble with Crowdsourcing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2009/06/the-trouble-with-crowdsourcing.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2009/06/the-trouble-with-crowdsourcing.html</link>
	<description>Web Marketing Strategies for Small Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:51:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos Hernandez</title>
		<link>http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2009/06/the-trouble-with-crowdsourcing.html/comment-page-1#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos Hernandez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2009/06/the-trouble-with-crowdsourcing.html#comment-123</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;My vote is number 2.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Have fun with the process!&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My vote is number 2.</p>
<p>Have fun with the process!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos Hernandez</title>
		<link>http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2009/06/the-trouble-with-crowdsourcing.html/comment-page-1#comment-7838</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos Hernandez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2009/06/the-trouble-with-crowdsourcing.html#comment-7838</guid>
		<description>My vote is number 2.

Have fun with the process!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My vote is number 2.</p>
<p>Have fun with the process!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly Sherburne</title>
		<link>http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2009/06/the-trouble-with-crowdsourcing.html/comment-page-1#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly Sherburne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2009/06/the-trouble-with-crowdsourcing.html#comment-122</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Great post. Very informative. Here&#039;s my 2 cents.... I like #1, but to create more white space which you want, how about tucking the URL up close under the t and e of flyte. Align it left next to the y and extend it to the right edge of the e. You could drop the www, but I&#039;d be inclined to leave it b/c it makes it instantly recognizable as a URL, esp since .biz isn&#039;t as common to see as a .com. Hope that&#039;s useful.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. Very informative. Here&#39;s my 2 cents&#8230;. I like #1, but to create more white space which you want, how about tucking the URL up close under the t and e of flyte. Align it left next to the y and extend it to the right edge of the e. You could drop the www, but I&#39;d be inclined to leave it b/c it makes it instantly recognizable as a URL, esp since .biz isn&#39;t as common to see as a .com. Hope that&#39;s useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly Sherburne</title>
		<link>http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2009/06/the-trouble-with-crowdsourcing.html/comment-page-1#comment-7837</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly Sherburne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2009/06/the-trouble-with-crowdsourcing.html#comment-7837</guid>
		<description>Great post. Very informative. Here&#039;s my 2 cents.... I like #1, but to create more white space which you want, how about tucking the URL up close under the t and e of flyte. Align it left next to the y and extend it to the right edge of the e. You could drop the www, but I&#039;d be inclined to leave it b/c it makes it instantly recognizable as a URL, esp since .biz isn&#039;t as common to see as a .com. Hope that&#039;s useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. Very informative. Here&#039;s my 2 cents&#8230;. I like #1, but to create more white space which you want, how about tucking the URL up close under the t and e of flyte. Align it left next to the y and extend it to the right edge of the e. You could drop the www, but I&#039;d be inclined to leave it b/c it makes it instantly recognizable as a URL, esp since .biz isn&#039;t as common to see as a .com. Hope that&#039;s useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Margaret Lukens</title>
		<link>http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2009/06/the-trouble-with-crowdsourcing.html/comment-page-1#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Lukens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2009/06/the-trouble-with-crowdsourcing.html#comment-121</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Big question: what do you want the sticker to do? Is its purpose to start a conversation? send people to your website? make your logo instantly recognizable among Maine drivers? (If you&#039;ve shared the stickers&#039; purpose in other tweets or posts, sorry that I missed it.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That said, I admire the design philosophy of E. Tufte, which includes minimizing the use of non-data ink. So, no unnecessary borders, for example. And these days you can dispense with the &quot;www.&quot; in most cases; it doesn&#039;t add any meaning.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I, too, love your plane. Including the company name in large letters doesn&#039;t particularly help the casual driver find you because of your .biz suffix. They&#039;ve got to get close enough to see the web address, which will give them the &quot;flyte&quot; too, so no need to duplicate it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So can you tell? I&#039;m the whole person who favored #5.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big question: what do you want the sticker to do? Is its purpose to start a conversation? send people to your website? make your logo instantly recognizable among Maine drivers? (If you&#39;ve shared the stickers&#39; purpose in other tweets or posts, sorry that I missed it.)</p>
<p>That said, I admire the design philosophy of E. Tufte, which includes minimizing the use of non-data ink. So, no unnecessary borders, for example. And these days you can dispense with the &quot;www.&quot; in most cases; it doesn&#39;t add any meaning.</p>
<p>I, too, love your plane. Including the company name in large letters doesn&#39;t particularly help the casual driver find you because of your .biz suffix. They&#39;ve got to get close enough to see the web address, which will give them the &quot;flyte&quot; too, so no need to duplicate it.</p>
<p>So can you tell? I&#39;m the whole person who favored #5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Margaret Lukens</title>
		<link>http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2009/06/the-trouble-with-crowdsourcing.html/comment-page-1#comment-7836</link>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Lukens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2009/06/the-trouble-with-crowdsourcing.html#comment-7836</guid>
		<description>Big question: what do you want the sticker to do? Is its purpose to start a conversation? send people to your website? make your logo instantly recognizable among Maine drivers? (If you&#039;ve shared the stickers&#039; purpose in other tweets or posts, sorry that I missed it.)

That said, I admire the design philosophy of E. Tufte, which includes minimizing the use of non-data ink. So, no unnecessary borders, for example. And these days you can dispense with the &quot;www.&quot; in most cases; it doesn&#039;t add any meaning.

I, too, love your plane. Including the company name in large letters doesn&#039;t particularly help the casual driver find you because of your .biz suffix. They&#039;ve got to get close enough to see the web address, which will give them the &quot;flyte&quot; too, so no need to duplicate it.

So can you tell? I&#039;m the whole person who favored #5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big question: what do you want the sticker to do? Is its purpose to start a conversation? send people to your website? make your logo instantly recognizable among Maine drivers? (If you&#039;ve shared the stickers&#039; purpose in other tweets or posts, sorry that I missed it.)</p>
<p>That said, I admire the design philosophy of E. Tufte, which includes minimizing the use of non-data ink. So, no unnecessary borders, for example. And these days you can dispense with the &quot;www.&quot; in most cases; it doesn&#039;t add any meaning.</p>
<p>I, too, love your plane. Including the company name in large letters doesn&#039;t particularly help the casual driver find you because of your .biz suffix. They&#039;ve got to get close enough to see the web address, which will give them the &quot;flyte&quot; too, so no need to duplicate it.</p>
<p>So can you tell? I&#039;m the whole person who favored #5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Flaherty</title>
		<link>http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2009/06/the-trouble-with-crowdsourcing.html/comment-page-1#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Flaherty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2009/06/the-trouble-with-crowdsourcing.html#comment-120</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Despite the low ratings for 3 and 5, I really like the idea of having a large logo, no company name, and a small URL.  If I wasn&#039;t aware of flyte, just the logo would make me curious to find out more.  I didn&#039;t cast a vote initially, but I prefer 5 and 6!&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite the low ratings for 3 and 5, I really like the idea of having a large logo, no company name, and a small URL.  If I wasn&#39;t aware of flyte, just the logo would make me curious to find out more.  I didn&#39;t cast a vote initially, but I prefer 5 and 6!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Flaherty</title>
		<link>http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2009/06/the-trouble-with-crowdsourcing.html/comment-page-1#comment-7835</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Flaherty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flyteblog.com/flyte/2009/06/the-trouble-with-crowdsourcing.html#comment-7835</guid>
		<description>Despite the low ratings for 3 and 5, I really like the idea of having a large logo, no company name, and a small URL.  If I wasn&#039;t aware of flyte, just the logo would make me curious to find out more.  I didn&#039;t cast a vote initially, but I prefer 5 and 6!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite the low ratings for 3 and 5, I really like the idea of having a large logo, no company name, and a small URL.  If I wasn&#039;t aware of flyte, just the logo would make me curious to find out more.  I didn&#039;t cast a vote initially, but I prefer 5 and 6!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

